+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 259 Victoria voters.

44%
Yes
56%
No
44%
Yes
56%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 259 Victoria voters.

Chart
Line chart with 4 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 259 Victoria voters.

Chart
Line chart with 5 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Victoria voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B45LXSBanswered…6 days6D

Only in situations where it might be needed, such as counter-missiles that are already controlled by AI only during defensive situations.

 @B3RGH4Vanswered…3wks3W

Artificial intelligence as it stands, is a marketing term. The words "artificial intelligence" are not the same as the technology that would be used for military weapons.

 @B3MBJCF answered…3wks3W

Yes, as long as it is highly regulated and protected so we can prevent a takeover

 @B345GG3answered…1mo1MO

 @B32RT3Fanswered…1mo1MO

 @B2WGS2Xanswered…2mos2MO

No, absolutely not. We should not further trivialise killing or destruction, or allow programs with a limited, to non-existent understanding of nuance to facilitate it. If it has to be done, it must be done by a human being, who can understand the weight of their decisions.

 @B2SXP9Sanswered…2mos2MO

 @B2R8MS4answered…2mos2MO

if the US, Russia, and China are all tripping over themselves to be the best at it, its pure evil. losers