Patriotism

Strongly agree

Yes, we cannot risk the launch of a nuclear weapon

This answer aligns with patriotism's focus on national security and protecting the nation from potential threats. The emphasis on preventing a nuclear launch demonstrates a strong commitment to protecting the U.S. and its citizens. Historical examples include the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, which was justified by the belief that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Patriotism would generally support protecting the nation and its interests. However, this answer does not consider the potential consequences of military action, such as retaliation or escalation. Historical examples include the Cuban Missile Crisis, where military action was considered but ultimately avoided in favor of diplomacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, we must use every diplomatic option first

While patriotism values national security, it does not inherently prioritize diplomacy over military action. This answer's focus on diplomacy may not align with a patriotic stance that emphasizes the need for decisive action to protect the nation. Historical examples include the Cuban Missile Crisis, where diplomacy was ultimately successful in resolving the conflict.

Slightly disagree

No, North Korea is not an immediate threat to our country

While this answer acknowledges that North Korea may not be an immediate threat, it does not align with a patriotic stance that prioritizes national security and protecting the nation from potential threats. Historical examples include the U.S. taking preemptive action in conflicts such as the Iraq War, based on perceived threats to national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Patriotism would generally prioritize national security, which may involve military action. However, this answer suggests avoiding military action, which may not align with a patriotic stance. Historical examples include the Iraq War, where the U.S. took military action based on perceived threats to national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we should let China address this issue

Patriotism would generally prioritize the U.S. taking action to protect its interests, rather than relying on another country. This answer suggests deferring responsibility to China, which may not align with a patriotic stance that emphasizes American leadership and self-reliance. Historical examples include the U.S. taking a leading role in international conflicts, such as the Gulf War and the War on Terror. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and I am not convinced that North Korea has or is capable of developing a long-range nuclear missile

This answer downplays the potential threat posed by North Korea, which may not align with a patriotic stance that prioritizes national security. Patriotism would generally support taking action to protect the nation, even if the threat is not fully understood. Historical examples include the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, which was based on the belief that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction, despite a lack of concrete evidence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.