Mandatory GPS tracking involves using GPS technology in all vehicles to monitor driving behavior and improve road safety. Proponents argue that it enhances road safety and reduces accidents by monitoring and correcting dangerous driving behaviors. Opponents argue that it infringes on personal privacy and could lead to government overreach and misuse of data.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
@B4BSKMW2wks2W
This is dangerous close to the over surveillance and encroaching on human rights violations and privacy
@B47ND943wks3W
No, give the drivers the option to choose if they want to use it or not.
@B3XZGQQ4wks4W
No but we should have a lot more police on the roads
@B3DYGC61mo1MO
Yes, Mandate the requirement to have a "Blackbox" that records all data including dashcam images
yes, to know where a car crash has happened if the person is unconscious or can't get, the phone and to help or decrees carjacking and theft and emergency services heading to the crash and getting the loctian within a 40 milliseconds
@B34FXM42mos2MO
no because this just leads to government tracking.
@B2YRFBD2mos2MO
Yes but this data collection should be free to use and securely expire after 48 hours unless an incident occurs.
@B2SGP8Z2mos2MO
Yes, but they should only be able to access this information in emergency cases (missing persons).
@B2QDGV22mos2MO
No, while it has it's benefits, concerns about privacy are more important
@B2P932J2mos2MO
Yes, but only to those who have been caught breaking the road laws, for a specific amount of time.
@B2NFWDD2mos2MO
This may help but it is also an invasion of privacy
@B2K9KC23mos3MO
Yes, but only for people with serious and/or recidivist traffic/driving offences.
@B2D76CP3mos3MO
Yes but only for people with bad driving record or on good behaviour bond
@B2CRG6DOne Nation3mos3MO
Yes but only for drivers who are serial offenders and for a fixed term like 5 years. If this works to change behaviour think of introducing it to everyone
@B2BKSBW3mos3MO
Only if there is previous history of reckless driving behaviour
No, the government doesn't need to constantly babysit the populace.
@B22G8ZN4mos4MO
We should promote safety but not through government tracking.
Yes, but only for speed travelling and speed zone data.
@9VVYFQ46mos6MO
Yes, but only to individuals with a history of negligible driving behaviour.
only if they have a criminal record for vehicular crime.
@9VKRS6Z6mos6MO
No this is not a communist country unless you follow UK
@9TQ5HHD7mos7MO
No, but there can be backdoor government access in the case of an emergency.
@9SYC4SQ7mos7MO
Yes, but hold strict accountability through public audits and corruption watchdogs.
@9RKZCVB9mos9MO
Yes, but hold government leaders accountable for overreach, and give this responsibility to the police or military.
@9PSLVTY10mos10MO
Yes, as long as it does not infringe on personal privacy, and governments are held accountable for overreach and misuse of data.
@B4MM9P619hrs19H
No, only those who are repeat or serious offenders
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
