These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Australian voter ranked them on the quiz.
EB>EB ChatGPT Party ResearchYes |
Emma Bennett’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes
The Animal Justice Party has publicly supported changing the date of Australia Day, aligning with concerns that 26 January is experienced as “Invasion Day” by many First Nations people. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, January 26 marks the beginning of British colonization and the dispossession of Indigenous people
This matches the core rationale commonly cited by AJP and other progressive parties: 26 January is tied to the start of British colonisation (First Fleet era) and subsequent dispossession and violence against Indigenous peoples. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, we need a national day that unites all Australians rather than divides us
AJP would strongly agree with the unity/inclusion framing—seeking a national day that does not alienate First Nations communities—though it typically also emphasises the colonisation/dispossession history explicitly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, leave the date alone and focus on more important issues like the cost of living
AJP would disagree with deprioritising the issue; it tends to support both cost-of-living policies and symbolic/structural reforms, and does not argue that the date should be left alone. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, this is symbolic virtue signaling that does nothing to solve the actual issues facing Indigenous communities
AJP generally rejects the “virtue signalling” framing; while it supports substantive Indigenous justice measures, it also treats changing the date as a meaningful act of recognition rather than a distraction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
AJP’s stated position supports moving Australia Day from 26 January, so it would strongly disagree with keeping the date unchanged. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, January 26 marks the foundation of modern Australia and we should not be ashamed of our history
This directly conflicts with AJP’s view that 26 January is not an appropriate celebratory date because of its association with invasion/colonisation and Indigenous dispossession. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.