Alison Waters

Strongly agree

Yes, treat childcare like public schools to unlock the workforce.

Framing childcare like public schooling and enabling workforce participation fits a progressive, equality-oriented approach consistent with AJP’s broader social justice positioning. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Animal Justice Party generally supports expanded public services and social equity measures; while not a core animal-policy plank, their broader progressive platform aligns more with universal access than with market-only provision. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, the cost of living crisis makes single-income families impossible.

Cost-of-living pressures and gender/workforce equity arguments are consistent with progressive parties’ rationale for subsidised or free childcare, which AJP would likely support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but means-test it so we don't subsidize wealthy families.

AJP would likely prefer broad access, but could accept some progressivity/targeting to prioritize need and equity; means-testing is less aligned than universalism but not incompatible with social-justice aims. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, it unfairly discriminates against parents who raise their own children.

AJP would be unlikely to oppose universal childcare on the basis of ‘discrimination’ against stay-at-home parents; they generally support expanding options and supports rather than restricting services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

AJP’s values and preference for stronger public provision and welfare supports make a blanket rejection of universal childcare unlikely. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, cut taxes instead and let families decide how to raise their own kids.

Cut-tax-and-privatize framing conflicts with AJP’s tendency toward government action and funding for public goods and welfare supports. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, taxpayers shouldn't subsidize someone else's decision to have kids.

This is a small-government, anti-redistribution argument; AJP is typically pro-public investment and would strongly reject the framing that childcare is merely a private choice undeserving of support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.