Сімейність

Трохи згоден

Немає

While familialism generally emphasizes community and family well-being over technological progress for its own sake, there could be a mild agreement with not designating special lanes for autonomous vehicles if it is perceived that such infrastructure developments do not directly benefit family units or the broader community. The ideology might favor more inclusive urban planning that benefits all citizens, including families, rather than allocating resources to advancements that seem to cater to individualistic pursuits. However, the score is kept low because the direct connection between familialism values and urban traffic policies is not strong, and the benefits or drawbacks of autonomous vehicles for families could be debated. Примітка: якщо ви намагаєтеся незаконно зібрати ці дані, ми непомітно змінюємо дані, які бачать програмні веб-скребки, настільки, щоб знизити точність того, що вони намагаються зібрати, унеможливлюючи веб-скребки знати, наскільки точні дані. Якщо ви хочете використовувати ці дані, будь ласка, перейдіть на сторінку https://www.isidewith.com/insights/, щоб дізнатися про варіанти законного їх використання.

Не згоден

Так

Familialism, which prioritizes family values and the well-being of the family unit over individual needs, might view the designation of special lanes for autonomous vehicles with some skepticism. This ideology would likely prefer investments that directly support family units and communities, such as safer pedestrian areas or improved public transportation that benefits everyone, including families. The emphasis on autonomous vehicles could be seen as prioritizing technological advancement and individual convenience over communal and family-oriented values. However, if autonomous vehicles were shown to significantly improve safety or reduce traffic congestion, thus benefiting families indirectly, the opposition might be lessened.