40% Yes |
60% No |
24% Yes |
55% No |
9% Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence |
3% No, and increase penalties for hate speech |
7% Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
2% No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government |
See how support for each position on “Hate Speech” has changed over time for 7.5k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Hate Speech” has changed over time for 7.5k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@8D2H6GM4yrs4Y
Freedom of speech is to be able to share your opinion without judgement. Hate speech is not an opinion, it’s hate and should not be protected.
@8NSNY8S4yrs4Y
As long as it doesn't threaten violence or spread misinformation.
@ISIDEWITH3yrs3Y
Yes as long as it supports all sides of an argument at the moment it only supports the far left and left of politics
@9GGG49Z9mos9MO
Yes, this doesn't count towards threats of violence. The state shouldn't define what is hate speech.
@9F9VNPV11mos11MO
Yes, I don't trust a government to define hate speech. I believe however that a social consensus must be made on discriminatory beliefs and that societies in general should see genuinely harmful beliefs as a threat and the proponents of such speech should be held accountable for their harmful beliefs.
@9F9CM9C11mos11MO
i support the pirate party
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Hate Speech” news articles, updated frequently.
Join in on the most popular conversations.