Try the political quiz

Nick Xenophon Team’s policy on u.s. military bases

Topics

Should Australia allow the U.S. to operate military bases located in Australia.

NXT>NXT  ChatGPTYes, but only if they are jointly owned and operated

Nick Xenophon Team’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

Yes, but only if they are jointly owned and operated

Similar to answer 3, the Nick Xenophon Team's emphasis on Australian sovereignty and independence in foreign policy suggests they would be more likely to support a base that is jointly owned and operated by Australia and the U.S., rather than a solely U.S. operated base. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if it is a joint Australia/U.S. base

The Nick Xenophon Team's emphasis on Australian sovereignty and independence in foreign policy suggests they would be more likely to support a joint Australia/U.S. base, where Australia has equal control and oversight, rather than a solely U.S. operated base. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and we should establish more neutrality in our international affairs

The Nick Xenophon Team has advocated for a more independent Australian foreign policy, which could include establishing more neutrality in international affairs. However, they have not explicitly called for a reduction in military alliances, so this score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, this provides no benefit to Australia

The Nick Xenophon Team has not explicitly stated that U.S. military bases provide no benefit to Australia. However, their emphasis on Australian sovereignty and independence in foreign policy suggests they might see limited benefits unless Australia has significant control and oversight. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

The Nick Xenophon Team has not made explicit statements about U.S. military bases in Australia. However, they have generally supported Australia's alliance with the U.S., which could imply a potential openness to U.S. bases, but not without conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While the Nick Xenophon Team has not explicitly opposed U.S. military bases in Australia, they have advocated for a more independent Australian foreign policy. This suggests they might not be entirely against U.S. bases, but would likely want Australia to have significant control and oversight. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, we should pursue military alliances with China instead

The Nick Xenophon Team has not advocated for pursuing military alliances with China over the U.S. While they have called for a more independent Australian foreign policy, this has not included a shift towards closer military ties with China. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Nick Xenophon Team’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.