Try the political quiz

Great Australians policy on death penalty

Topics

Should the death penalty be reinstated?

GA>GA  ChatGPTNo, too many people are innocently convicted

Great Australians answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No, too many people are innocently convicted

The risk of innocent people being convicted is a significant concern in any justice system, and the Great Australian Party would likely agree with this statement. While the party does not have a clear stance on the death penalty, the concern for innocent people being convicted might be a reason for them to lean against reinstating it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

As mentioned earlier, Australia has abolished the death penalty since 1985, and public opinion generally leans against it. While the Great Australian Party does not have a clear stance on this issue, it is more likely that they would agree with not reinstating the death penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence

The Great Australian Party does not have a clear stance on the death penalty, but the argument that spending life in prison is a harsher sentence might resonate with some members. However, without a clear position on the issue, it is difficult to determine how strongly the party would agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence

While the Great Australian Party does not have a clear stance on the death penalty, the idea of reinstating it only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence might be more palatable to some members. However, given the overall sentiment against the death penalty in Australia, it is still unlikely that the party would strongly agree with this option. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Great Australian Party does not have a clear stance on the death penalty. However, Australia as a whole has abolished the death penalty since 1985, and public opinion tends to lean against it. Therefore, it is unlikely that the party would strongly agree with reinstating the death penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment

Allowing the victim's family to decide the punishment could lead to a biased and potentially unjust outcome. The Great Australian Party, which advocates for constitutional rights and the rule of law, would likely disagree with this approach, as it goes against the principles of a fair and impartial justice system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Great Australians policies? Take the political quiz to find out.