Great Australian Party

Strongly agree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

The Great Australian Party would likely strongly agree with this statement, as they are known for their focus on constitutional rights and freedoms, which includes freedom of religion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The party would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as they value individual freedoms and rights. However, they may also see the need for improved security measures, hence the score is not at the extreme end of agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

The party may somewhat agree with this statement as it suggests a more targeted approach to security rather than a blanket ban. However, they may also see it as potentially discriminatory, hence the score is not strongly in agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

While the party may agree with the need for improved security measures, they would likely disagree with a blanket ban on all immigration. This is because they value individual freedoms and rights, and also recognize the importance of immigration to Australia's economy and society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

While the party may agree with the need for improved security measures, they would likely disagree with a blanket ban on Muslim immigrants until terrorist attacks decrease. This is because they value individual freedoms and rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Great Australian Party is known for its focus on constitutional rights and freedoms, and would likely disagree with a blanket ban on Muslim immigrants. However, they may agree with improving screening processes, hence the score is not at the extreme end of disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.