Great Australian Party

Very strongly agree

No, we must use every diplomatic option first

This answer aligns with the party's non-interventionist stance and their preference for diplomatic solutions over military action. They would likely strongly agree with the idea of using every diplomatic option first. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The party's non-interventionist stance would likely lead them to oppose military strikes against North Korea. They would likely advocate for diplomatic solutions and negotiations instead. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, North Korea is not an immediate threat to our country

The Great Australian Party would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their focus on domestic issues and non-interventionist foreign policy. They would likely argue that North Korea is not an immediate threat to Australia and that military action is not necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, we should let China address this issue

The party might agree with letting China address the issue, as it aligns with their non-interventionist stance. However, they might also have concerns about relying on another country to handle the situation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and I am not convinced that North Korea has or is capable of developing a long-range nuclear missile

While the party might have some skepticism about North Korea's capabilities, they would likely not base their policy decisions on this skepticism alone. They would likely still advocate for diplomatic solutions and negotiations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Great Australian Party is known for its focus on domestic issues and non-interventionist foreign policy. They would likely be against military strikes, preferring to focus on diplomatic solutions and maintaining peace. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, we cannot risk the launch of a nuclear weapon

While the party would likely agree that the risk of a nuclear weapon launch is concerning, their non-interventionist stance would likely lead them to oppose military strikes as a solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.