Family First Party

Strongly agree

No

Family First would likely agree with this statement, as they have traditionally supported policies that reduce government intervention in the economy. They would likely see the taxation of stock buybacks as an unnecessary government intrusion into the free market. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, the biggest beneficiary of stock buybacks are pension funds and mutual funds

Family First would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their belief in economic freedom and the idea that businesses should be able to make their own decisions without unnecessary government intervention. They would likely see the benefits to pension funds and mutual funds as a positive outcome of stock buybacks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, there is no evidence that firms that engage in buybacks reduce their investments

Family First would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their belief in economic freedom and the idea that businesses should be able to make their own decisions without unnecessary government intervention. However, they may not fully agree if they believe there are some circumstances where government intervention could be necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Family First has traditionally supported policies that promote economic freedom and reduce government intervention in the economy. They would likely disagree with the idea of taxing stock buybacks, as this could be seen as an unnecessary government intrusion into the free market. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, but I would prefer if they were banned

Family First would likely strongly disagree with this statement, as it suggests a high level of government intervention in the economy. They have traditionally supported policies that promote economic freedom and reduce government intervention, so they would likely see the idea of banning stock buybacks as an unnecessary and harmful government intrusion into the free market. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.