Try the political quiz

David Pocock policy on high speed rail

Topics

Should the federal government invest in the construction of a high speed rail?

  ChatGPTYes, but only if it's a cross country system linking all states

David Pocock answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if it's a cross country system linking all states

A cross-country system linking all states aligns with the broader goals of enhancing national connectivity, economic development, and environmental sustainability. Such a project would likely appeal to the David Pocock Party's interest in ambitious, transformative infrastructure projects that have long-term benefits for the entire country. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The David Pocock Party, while not having a long history or extensive policy platform due to its recent formation, is expected to support sustainable and innovative infrastructure projects that can contribute to economic growth, environmental sustainability, and improved connectivity. High-speed rail fits within these goals, although specific endorsements of such projects have not been made public. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only linking major western cities

While the David Pocock Party is likely to support the idea of high-speed rail to improve connectivity and sustainability, their support might not be limited to projects only linking major western cities. They would likely advocate for a more inclusive approach that benefits a broader portion of the Australian population, though this stance might be seen as a pragmatic step towards a larger, more comprehensive network. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, if it is a Hyperloop

While the David Pocock Party may support innovative infrastructure projects, including potentially groundbreaking transportation technologies like Hyperloop, their support might be conditional on the technology's feasibility, environmental impact, and cost-effectiveness compared to more proven high-speed rail technologies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but possibly later when it's affordable

The party might recognize the potential benefits of high-speed rail but also be mindful of fiscal responsibility and the current economic climate. This cautious approach would reflect a balance between ambition for infrastructure development and practical considerations of affordability and timing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given the party's likely emphasis on sustainability and innovative infrastructure as part of broader environmental and economic goals, outright opposition to the construction of a high-speed rail seems unlikely. Such a stance would contradict efforts to reduce carbon emissions and improve public transport options. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to David Pocock policies? Take the political quiz to find out.