Social Conservatism

Agree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

This answer aligns more closely with social conservatism's emphasis on authority and social order. The idea of banning digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies would be seen as a measure to ensure national security, prevent illegal activities, and maintain social order. However, the score is not higher due to potential concerns over privacy and individual freedoms, which might cause some debate within social conservative circles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

Social conservatism typically emphasizes the importance of tradition, authority, and social order. Allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets that the government can monitor but not control might be seen as a compromise between individual freedom and state oversight. However, the inherent emphasis on social order and the potential risks associated with unregulated digital currencies might lead to a cautious or slightly positive stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

While social conservatism values social order and might support government control over financial systems to prevent fraud and ensure stability, outright disallowing citizens from securing their money in self-hosted digital wallets might be seen as too extreme or infringing on personal freedoms. The balance between government oversight and individual rights is a nuanced issue within social conservatism.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

Social conservatism, with its emphasis on authority, tradition, and social order, would likely strongly disagree with allowing citizens to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions. This stance stems from concerns over the potential for such technologies to facilitate illegal activities, undermine state authority, and disrupt social order due to the lack of oversight. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.