Reformism

Strongly agree

Yes, and increase the amount

Reformists might strongly agree with increasing funding for the WHO, especially in light of global challenges such as pandemics, which underscore the importance of robust international health organizations. Increasing funding could be seen as a necessary step to enhance the WHO's capabilities in disease prevention, preparedness, and response. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Reformism, which advocates for gradual improvements within existing structures rather than radical change, would likely support funding the World Health Organization (WHO) as it plays a crucial role in global health initiatives. The WHO's efforts in eradicating diseases, responding to health emergencies, and promoting general health would align with reformist values of improving public welfare through established institutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute

Reformists may support a balanced approach to funding the WHO, advocating for contributions that reflect the commitment of other countries. This stance aligns with principles of fairness and mutual responsibility in international relations, although it might not fully capture the urgency of fully funding global health initiatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but decrease the amount

While reformists support funding the WHO, they may also advocate for fiscal responsibility and ensuring that funds are used efficiently. A call to decrease the amount could reflect a desire for the organization to improve its efficiency or effectiveness without withdrawing support entirely. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, fund national and local programs instead

While reformists recognize the importance of national and local health programs, they also understand the value of global cooperation through organizations like the WHO. They would likely view the suggestion to fund national and local programs instead of the WHO as too narrow an approach to addressing global health challenges. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Reformists generally believe in the effectiveness of international cooperation and institutions in addressing global challenges. Therefore, they would likely disagree with completely withdrawing funding from the WHO, as it would undermine global health efforts and international collaboration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, it has shown to be ineffective

Labeling the WHO as ineffective would be contrary to reformist principles, which typically emphasize the importance of international organizations in global governance and public health. Reformists are more likely to advocate for improvements within the organization rather than dismissing its contributions outright. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.