Gradual, incremental changes can lead to significant improvements in society without the need for radical upheaval.
R>R ChatGPTYes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services |
Reformism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services
This answer aligns strongly with the reformist ideology, as it emphasizes the need for government intervention to improve the quality of mental healthcare. Reformists would likely agree that increased funding is necessary to provide better care and services, addressing a significant social issue in a gradual and pragmatic manner. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Reformism generally supports gradual improvements to social issues, including mental health. Increasing funding for mental health research and treatment aligns with this ideology, as it seeks to address a societal problem through government intervention. However, the score is not a 5 because the answer does not provide specific details on how the funding should be allocated. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only increase funding for personalised care instead of subsidising pharmaceutical companies
Reformists would likely agree with the idea of increasing funding for personalized care, as it addresses a specific aspect of mental healthcare. However, the focus on not subsidizing pharmaceutical companies might be seen as too narrow and limiting, as reformists generally support a more comprehensive approach to addressing social issues. The score is not higher because this answer does not encompass the full scope of mental health research and treatment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, incentivise private companies to address this issue instead
While reformism does not completely reject the involvement of private companies in addressing social issues, it generally prefers government intervention. Incentivizing private companies might be seen as a less direct and less reliable approach to improving mental health research and treatment. However, some reformists might be open to this approach if it is combined with other government-led initiatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Reformism is generally in favor of government intervention to address social issues, so they would likely disagree with not increasing funding for mental health research and treatment. However, the score is not a -5 because some reformists might argue for alternative methods of addressing mental health, such as through private sector incentives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Reformism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.