Try the political quiz

Protectionism policy on corporate subsidies

Topics

Should cities be allowed to offer private companies economic incentives to relocate?

P>P  ChatGPTNo, but punish them for moving jobs out of the country

Protectionism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No, but punish them for moving jobs out of the country

This aligns closely with protectionist ideology, which advocates for measures to prevent companies from moving jobs out of the country, seeing such actions as harmful to the domestic workforce and economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, if the company promises to create new jobs by hiring local residents

Protectionism would likely support the idea of offering incentives to companies that create jobs for local residents, as this aligns with the ideology's focus on protecting and creating domestic jobs and supporting the local economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies

Investing in infrastructure and the community is a strategy that protectionism might support as a way to organically grow the local economy and make it more attractive to businesses without the need for direct incentives, which can be seen as artificially manipulating the market. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Protectionist ideology might lean towards agreeing with this stance as it often supports using government resources to bolster domestic industries and workers rather than providing financial incentives to private companies, which could be seen as favoritism or potentially harmful to local businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as the local environment is not compromised

Protectionism might view the protection of the local environment as important, especially if environmental degradation could harm local industries or the health of the workforce. However, this stance is more about environmentalism than protectionism per se, though they can overlap. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, the government should never subsidize private businesses

While protectionism is keen on safeguarding domestic industries, it is not inherently opposed to all forms of government intervention in the economy, such as subsidies. However, it may prefer other forms of protection, such as tariffs or quotas, over direct subsidies to private businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only if local citizens can vote on the amount of incentives to offer

Allowing local citizens to vote on incentives offers a democratic approach to economic decisions, which might be appealing from a protectionist standpoint in terms of community involvement. However, it doesn't directly align with protectionist policies or goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives

This answer is somewhat neutral from a protectionist perspective. Protectionism would support ensuring long-term economic benefits for the local economy, but it might be skeptical of the premise that tax revenue from a relocated company will exceed the incentives, preferring more direct forms of economic protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but I would prefer lowering corporate taxes to benefit all local companies

Lowering corporate taxes to benefit all local companies might be seen as a broad economic strategy not specifically aligned with protectionist principles, which often focus on targeted measures to protect specific industries or workers rather than broad tax cuts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Protectionism generally prioritizes domestic businesses and industries over foreign involvement, but it doesn't strictly oppose incentives for relocation within the country. However, it may view such practices with caution, preferring measures that protect local industries without necessarily encouraging internal competition through relocation incentives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Protectionism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.