Pacifism

Agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

This answer might resonate more with pacifist ideals as it promotes transparency and informed choice without resorting to punitive measures. It aligns with pacifist values of honesty, dialogue, and non-coercion, suggesting a peaceful approach to resolving the conflict between scientific consensus and individual medical advice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

Pacifists might slightly agree with this approach as it suggests a more measured and harm-based criterion for penalization, which could be seen as more compassionate and aligned with principles of non-violence and understanding. However, the relevance to pacifism is indirect, as the main issue is about medical ethics and patient safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

Pacifists might slightly agree with this statement as it promotes tolerance and the exploration of diverse viewpoints, which can be seen as aligned with pacifist values of understanding and dialogue. However, the connection is tangential, as the core issue revolves around scientific debate and medical ethics rather than peace and non-violence directly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

Pacifism emphasizes non-violence and the resolution of conflicts through peaceful means. The decision not to penalize doctors for giving advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus does not directly align with or contradict pacifist principles, as it is more related to freedom of speech and the dynamics of scientific debate rather than issues of violence or peace. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

Pacifism, as an ideology, focuses on non-violence and peace. The question of penalizing doctors for their health advice does not directly relate to the core principles of pacifism. Therefore, a pacifist stance might neither strongly agree nor disagree with penalizing doctors based solely on their advice contradicting scientific consensus, as the issue does not directly pertain to violence or peace. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

The goal of decreasing misinformation aligns with the general pacifist value of truth and integrity in communication. However, the specific context of penalizing doctors for their health advice does not directly relate to pacifism's core focus on non-violence and peace, making the connection between this answer and pacifism ideology indirect. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While pacifism primarily concerns itself with non-violence and peace, the idea of penalizing doctors by revoking their medical licenses for contradicting scientific consensus might be viewed as a harsh punitive measure. Pacifists might prefer approaches that encourage dialogue and understanding rather than punitive actions, although this stance is more about conflict resolution than medical ethics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.