Neo-Libertarianism

Agree

Yes

Neo-Libertarianism, with its emphasis on individual freedom and minimal government intervention, might see a two-state solution as a pragmatic approach to resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This ideology would likely support any solution that promises to reduce government coercion and increase peace and self-determination for individuals within both states. However, the support might not be strong because the focus of Neo-Libertarianism is more on individual rights and less on the specifics of state solutions or borders. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

While Neo-Libertarianism values minimal government and maximum freedom, it does not inherently oppose the concept of a two-state solution. The opposition would likely stem from concerns about the feasibility and effectiveness of such a solution in truly ensuring individual freedoms and minimizing government intervention. Neo-Libertarians might be skeptical of the ability of a newly formed state to operate without significant coercion or to guarantee the rights and freedoms of its citizens. However, this skepticism does not equate to strong disagreement, as the ideology would primarily focus on the outcomes for individual liberty rather than the political arrangement itself. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.