National Conservatism

Agree

No, only if it is an immediate threat to our safety

This answer aligns more closely with National Conservatism's principles, which prioritize the safety and interests of the nation above international engagements. The conditional support for peace talks only if there is an immediate threat to national safety reflects the ideology's focus on pragmatic and interest-based foreign policy decisions. National Conservatives are likely to support international actions when they are directly related to national security concerns, making this stance more agreeable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, we should not get involved in foreign conflicts

National Conservatism's emphasis on national sovereignty and caution towards foreign entanglements makes this answer somewhat agreeable. The ideology often advocates for a focus on domestic issues and a reluctance to get involved in foreign conflicts unless directly necessary for national security. However, the outright dismissal of involvement might not fully align with the ideology's willingness to engage internationally if it serves national interests or security needs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

National Conservatism might lean slightly towards not supporting peace talks between Saudi Arabia and Iran due to its emphasis on national sovereignty and a cautious approach to international engagement. The ideology's preference for prioritizing national interests and skepticism of international institutions and agreements could lead to a stance where involvement in such peace talks is seen as unnecessary or even potentially entangling, unless there are direct benefits or threats to the nation's security or interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

National Conservatism places a strong emphasis on national sovereignty and non-interference in the internal affairs of other nations, unless it directly impacts the nation's interests. Supporting peace talks between Saudi Arabia and Iran could be seen as a positive step towards regional stability, which might indirectly benefit national interests. However, the ideology's general skepticism towards international interventions and preference for a more isolationist or unilateral approach to foreign policy might temper outright support without clear national benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, we should always promote diplomatic peace talks during foreign conflicts

While National Conservatism does not inherently oppose peace or diplomatic efforts, its emphasis on national sovereignty, cautious approach to international engagement, and skepticism towards global institutions might make it less supportive of always promoting diplomatic peace talks during foreign conflicts. The ideology's preference for prioritizing national interests and a more isolationist stance in foreign policy could lead to a mild disagreement with the idea of always supporting peace talks, especially if they do not directly serve national interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.