Natalism

Strongly agree

Yes

Natalism, which emphasizes the promotion of human reproduction, would likely support government funding for genetic engineering for disease prevention and treatment, as it could lead to healthier populations and potentially increase birth rates by reducing the incidence of genetic diseases that might deter individuals from having children. While not directly related to natalism, the ideology's focus on increasing population growth aligns with the benefits of reducing genetic diseases, thus supporting a healthier society that can sustain and grow its population. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Natalists would likely disagree with the stance against government funding for genetic engineering for disease prevention and treatment because such research could play a crucial role in ensuring the health and viability of future generations. By preventing genetic diseases, societies can potentially increase fertility rates and ensure that more children are born healthy, aligning with natalist goals of promoting population growth. Therefore, opposing funding for such research could be seen as counterproductive to the aims of natalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.