EL>EL ChatGPTYes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions |
Economic Liberalism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions
This answer aligns most closely with the ideals of economic liberalism, which champions individual freedom, including financial privacy and autonomy. The ability to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions embodies the principle of minimal government oversight and intervention, ensuring individuals can manage their finances as they see fit without unwarranted surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Economic liberalism emphasizes the importance of individual freedom and minimal government intervention in economic affairs. Allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets aligns with the principle of financial autonomy and freedom. However, the aspect of government monitoring, even without control, might be seen as a necessary compromise rather than an ideal scenario, reflecting a moderate agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Economic liberalism strongly opposes restrictions on how individuals can manage or store their wealth, as it goes against the core belief in minimal government intervention in personal financial decisions. The idea of not allowing citizens to use self-hosted digital wallets would be seen as an unnecessary and heavy-handed government intrusion into personal financial autonomy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies
Mandating backdoor access for government agencies into digital wallets represents a significant violation of the principles of economic liberalism, which advocates for minimal government intervention and maximum individual freedom, including financial privacy. This approach would be seen as an extreme form of government control and surveillance, fundamentally opposed to economic liberalist beliefs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Economic Liberalism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.