Cosmopolitanism

Strongly agree

Yes

Cosmopolitanism, with its emphasis on global justice and reducing inequalities, would likely support government subsidies for ride-sharing services for low-income individuals. This aligns with the cosmopolitan view that governments have a role in ensuring that all citizens, regardless of income, have access to essential services. This approach is in line with cosmopolitan thinkers like Kwame Anthony Appiah and Martha Nussbaum, who advocate for policies that address global and local inequalities and enhance the capabilities of individuals to participate fully in society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Cosmopolitanism, focusing on global citizenship and the moral obligation to reduce inequality, would generally disagree with the stance against subsidizing ride-sharing for low-income individuals. This ideology supports the idea that governments should work to diminish disparities and ensure equitable access to services, including transportation, as a means to foster equal opportunities for participation in society. Not subsidizing these services could be seen as neglecting the needs of less advantaged citizens, which contradicts cosmopolitan principles of equity and global justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.