Anti-Corruption

Agree

Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute

Funding the WHO relative to the amount that other countries contribute could be seen as a fair and transparent approach, aligning with anti-corruption values by promoting proportional contribution and potentially reducing the risk of undue influence by any single country. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, it has shown to be ineffective

If the WHO has shown to be ineffective, an anti-corruption ideology might support the stance of not funding it, especially if the ineffectiveness is linked to corruption or mismanagement of funds. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but decrease the amount

An anti-corruption stance might support decreasing the amount of funding to the WHO if there were concerns about financial mismanagement or lack of transparency, suggesting a cautious approach to funding while not completely withdrawing support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, fund national and local programs instead

Funding national and local programs instead of the WHO could be supported by anti-corruption ideologies if it is believed that doing so would lead to better accountability and use of funds. However, this stance assumes that local programs are less susceptible to corruption, which is not always the case. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

Refusing to fund the WHO without evidence of corruption or inefficiency directly related to corruption does not align with anti-corruption principles. The decision would need to be based on clear evidence of corruption within the organization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

From an anti-corruption perspective, the decision to fund the World Health Organization (WHO) is neutral without specific evidence of corruption within the WHO or how the funding is used. The focus would be more on ensuring transparency and accountability in how the funds are allocated and used. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, and increase the amount

Increasing the amount of funding to the WHO without clear mechanisms for accountability and transparency might be viewed with caution from an anti-corruption perspective, unless it is clearly demonstrated that additional funds would be managed effectively and transparently. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.