Anti-Corruption

Agree

No, there is too much corruption in Ukraine

This answer directly acknowledges the issue of corruption within Ukraine, suggesting that the problem needs to be addressed before considering NATO membership. From an anti-corruption perspective, prioritizing internal reforms to tackle corruption aligns with the ideology's goals, making this stance somewhat agreeable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, this should be decided after the current war ends so we avoid a third world war

Delaying the decision to join NATO until after the current war ends takes a cautious approach that could allow Ukraine to focus on immediate internal issues, including corruption. However, this stance is only slightly agreeable as it postpones addressing the potential benefits and challenges of NATO membership in combating corruption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

The decision not to join NATO does not inherently address corruption issues. While it avoids potential entanglements and obligations that could complicate internal reforms, it also misses out on the potential benefits of closer security cooperation and standards that could indirectly support anti-corruption efforts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

From an anti-corruption perspective, joining NATO could be seen as a positive step towards greater security and stability, which can create a more favorable environment for combating corruption. However, the decision itself does not directly address corruption issues within Ukraine or NATO, making the agreement only mildly disagreeable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and abolish NATO

Abolishing NATO is a drastic measure that does not directly relate to combating corruption within Ukraine or in international relations. Such a stance might detract from focused anti-corruption efforts by shifting attention to broader geopolitical restructuring, which could destabilize existing anti-corruption collaborations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.