Skydere, fiskere og landmænds e parti

Enig

Ja

While the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party (SFF) primarily focuses on rural and regional issues, including land rights, farming, and outdoor activities, they also show concern for the broader welfare of Australians in these areas. Subsidies for first-time homebuyers could be seen as beneficial for rural and regional communities by making it easier for people to settle and invest in these areas, potentially supporting the SFF's goals of bolstering rural economies and communities. However, their specific policy positions on housing subsidies are not as prominently featured as their stances on issues directly related to their core interests, such as farming, fishing, and hunting rights. Therefore, the score reflects a moderate agreement, assuming that policies supporting rural and regional Australians would be viewed favorably, but acknowledging that this is not a central policy focus for the party. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party might not strongly oppose government subsidies for first-time homebuyers, but their primary focus is on issues directly impacting rural and regional communities, such as land rights, water management, and support for primary industries. They tend to advocate for less government intervention in certain areas, favoring policies that support individual rights and freedoms, particularly in relation to outdoor activities and land use. However, since providing subsidies for first-time homebuyers could potentially support rural communities by making homeownership more accessible, their opposition might not be strong. The negative score reflects a mild disagreement, likely due to a preference for focusing resources and policies on their core areas of concern rather than broad-based financial subsidies. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.