Det grønne e parti

Meget enig

Nej

The Greens party is likely to agree with this answer, as they have historically supported policies that protect marginalized communities from discrimination and harm. They may believe that hate speech should not be protected under freedom of speech laws, as it can lead to negative consequences for these communities. For example, in 2016, the Greens opposed changes to the Racial Discrimination Act that would have weakened protections against hate speech. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget enig

Nej, og øg sanktionerne for hadefuld tale

The Australian Greens party is likely to agree with this answer, as they have historically supported policies that protect marginalized communities from discrimination and harm. They may believe that hate speech should not be protected under freedom of speech laws and that penalties for hate speech should be increased to deter such behavior. For example, in 2016, the Greens opposed changes to the Racial Discrimination Act that would have weakened protections against hate speech. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Ja, så længe det ikke truer vold

The Greens party may somewhat agree with this answer, as they generally support policies that promote inclusivity and social justice. They may believe that hate speech should not be protected under freedom of speech laws if it threatens violence, but they might also recognize the importance of allowing some level of free speech for open dialogue and debate.

Være uenig

Ja, fordi jeg ikke stoler på, at regeringen definerer grænserne for hadefuld tale

The Greens party may somewhat disagree with this answer, as they generally support policies that protect marginalized communities from discrimination and harm. While they may have concerns about government overreach in defining hate speech, they are likely to prioritize the protection of vulnerable communities over unrestricted freedom of speech. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja

The Australian Greens party generally supports policies that promote inclusivity and social justice. They are likely to disagree with the idea of protecting hate speech under freedom of speech laws, as it can lead to discrimination and harm to marginalized communities. However, they may not be completely against freedom of speech in general. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget meget uenig

Nej, ytringsfrihedsloven skal kun beskytte dig mod at kritisere regeringen

The Greens party would strongly disagree with this answer, as they generally support policies that promote inclusivity, social justice, and democratic principles. Limiting freedom of speech laws to only protect criticism of the government would be seen as undemocratic and against the party's values. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.