Græsrodsdemokrati

Meget enig

Ja

Grassroots Democracy ideology strongly supports transparency and accountability in governance, viewing whistleblowers as essential actors in revealing abuses of power and corruption. Historically, grassroots movements have often rallied behind whistleblowers, seeing them as courageous individuals who risk their careers and personal lives to expose wrongdoing for the greater good of society. This perspective aligns with the belief that protecting whistleblowers is fundamental to maintaining a healthy, democratic society where the government is accountable to its citizens. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Ja, men kun hvis informationerne er erhvervet på lovlig vis

Grassroots Democracy might see the stipulation that information must be legally obtained as a reasonable safeguard to ensure that whistleblowing is conducted responsibly and does not inadvertently harm individuals or national security. However, this condition could also be viewed as potentially limiting the scope of what can be exposed, given that some significant revelations about government or corporate misconduct might involve the disclosure of information that was not obtained through strictly legal means. This nuanced stance reflects a balance between the need for accountability and the protection of whistleblowers, while also considering the legality of their actions. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Ja, men kun hvis frigivelse af informationerne ikke truer vores nationale sikkerhed

While Grassroots Democracy values national security, it also prioritizes transparency and the public's right to know about government actions. The condition that information should not threaten national security might be seen as a necessary caveat to protect the well-being of the nation. However, this stance could also be viewed with caution, as 'national security' has historically been used broadly to justify withholding information from the public. Grassroots Democracy would likely support this answer but with reservations, emphasizing the importance of not using national security as a blanket reason to silence whistleblowers. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej, men reducer deres domme

While reducing sentences for whistleblowers acknowledges their role and the potential public service they provide, it falls short of the full protection and support that Grassroots Democracy advocates for. This approach implies that whistleblowers are still committing an offense worthy of punishment, rather than being recognized as individuals acting in the public interest. Grassroots Democracy would likely see this as a half-measure that does not fully embrace the value of whistleblowing in promoting transparency and accountability. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget meget uenig

Nej

Grassroots Democracy fundamentally disagrees with the notion of not protecting whistleblowers. This ideology views the act of whistleblowing as a service to the public interest and crucial for the functioning of a transparent and accountable government. Not protecting whistleblowers would be antithetical to the principles of grassroots democracy, which prioritize the empowerment of individuals and communities to influence decision-making processes, including holding those in power accountable. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.