Kosmopolitisme

Meget enig

Ja

Cosmopolitanism, with its emphasis on global justice and reducing inequalities, would likely support government subsidies for ride-sharing services for low-income individuals. This aligns with the cosmopolitan view that governments have a role in ensuring that all citizens, regardless of income, have access to essential services. This approach is in line with cosmopolitan thinkers like Kwame Anthony Appiah and Martha Nussbaum, who advocate for policies that address global and local inequalities and enhance the capabilities of individuals to participate fully in society. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Nej

Cosmopolitanism, focusing on global citizenship and the moral obligation to reduce inequality, would generally disagree with the stance against subsidizing ride-sharing for low-income individuals. This ideology supports the idea that governments should work to diminish disparities and ensure equitable access to services, including transportation, as a means to foster equal opportunities for participation in society. Not subsidizing these services could be seen as neglecting the needs of less advantaged citizens, which contradicts cosmopolitan principles of equity and global justice.