Kollektivisme

Enig

Ja

Collectivism emphasizes the importance of community and state over individual interests. Historically, collectivist ideologies, such as those found in socialist or communist states, have supported substantial government investment in technology and defense to protect and advance the interests of the state and its citizens as a whole. For example, the Soviet Union invested heavily in scientific and technological advancements during the Cold War to bolster its defense capabilities and compete with the United States. Investing in AI for defense applications aligns with the collectivist principle of using state resources to ensure the security and welfare of the community. However, the score is not a full 5 because collectivism also involves concerns about the ethical implications and potential for misuse of such technologies, which might temper outright enthusiasm. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej

While collectivism prioritizes the welfare and security of the community and might see the value in using AI for defense, there is also a strong emphasis on ethical considerations and the potential negative impacts of technology on society. Collectivist ideologies might be wary of the risks associated with AI, such as the potential for mass surveillance, privacy violations, and the escalation of autonomous weaponry, which could threaten global peace and individual freedoms. Historical instances, such as debates within socialist and communist societies about the balance between technological advancement and ethical considerations, reflect this caution. However, the need for defense and technological advancement for the greater good would likely outweigh absolute opposition, hence the score is not fully negative. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.