These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Australian voter ranked them on the quiz.
ED>ED Emma Davidson voterbaseNo |
Emma Davidson’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 8hrs ago
Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 276 voters that voted for Emma Davidson in the 2019 Australian Capital Territory Senatorial election.
Green Party Answer: No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “Nuclear is inherently unsafe, it is increasingly expensive, notoriously slow to develop and politically unpopular. Our future is...” ‐org.au
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 10hrs ago
Green Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 18,766 voters that identify as Green.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
