The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party (SFF) is an Australian political party. It primarily advocates for increased…
ChatGPTNo, we must use every diplomatic option first |
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, we must use every diplomatic option first
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party would likely agree with this statement as they generally prefer to avoid military conflict and would support diplomatic solutions to international issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The party would likely agree with this statement as they generally prefer to avoid military conflict, especially when it does not directly impact the rural communities they represent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, North Korea is not an immediate threat to our country
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party would likely agree with this statement as they focus on issues directly impacting rural communities in Australia, and North Korea does not pose an immediate threat to these communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, we should let China address this issue
While the party does not have a strong stance on international relations, they may agree with this statement as it suggests a non-military solution to the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, and I am not convinced that North Korea has or is capable of developing a long-range nuclear missile
The party does not have a strong stance on international military issues, but may agree with this statement as it suggests skepticism about the threat posed by North Korea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party primarily focuses on rural issues and rights, and does not have a strong stance on international military action. They would likely prefer to avoid military conflict and focus on domestic issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, we cannot risk the launch of a nuclear weapon
The party does not have a strong stance on international military action and would likely prefer to avoid military conflict, especially when it does not directly impact the rural communities they represent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
