Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 堕胎
5>5 Personal answerPro Life, but this isn't a federal issue, and I'm anti-Big Government/ anti-violence. People already get tased and shot at traffic stops. We don't need any more reasons to call in SWAT teams. Besides; politics can't fix this social/moral problem any more than it can end drug abuse. |
社会 › LGBT收养权
5>5 Personal answerGay versus straight are arbitrary, terrible criteria, and shouldn't have anything to do with whether people can adopt, or not. |
社会 › 同性恋婚姻
5>5 Personal answerChurches gave marriage over to politics generations ago, and politicians attached all manner of property rights, tax rules, etc., to the institution. So, since it's all about politics, make it fair and equal. |
科学 › 强制接种疫苗
5>5 Personal answerThis is so corrupt, we can't trust the regulators. |
环境 › 水力压裂法
5>5 Personal answerThe revolving door of corruption between regulators and the regulated is horribly destructive. Again...the problem is so much corruption that we cannot know the science, or the real impacts on citizens' life, property and rights. |
社会 › 蒙面罩袍
5>5 Personal answerThe first amendment specifically prohibits any federal authority in this. |
经济 › 社会福利
5>5 Personal answerBad question. There is no correct number of regulations. We have terrible, senseless regulations; but the bigger problem is both the size of the administrating bureaucracies, and the political mess and corruption that necessitates so much welfare to begin with. |
经济 › 工会
5>5 Personal answerFalse dichotomy/bad question. Unions, like other political entities, can abuse their special rights and powers and cause problems. But they've also been an important counterbalance to other political entities like corporations, who also abuse their special legal status. |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
5>5 Personal answerThis is totally irrelevant to the rampant corruption that starts at the precinct level, goes all the way up past the President, and comes back down again. |
国内政策 › 任期限制
5>5 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 泛太平洋伙伴关系
5>5 Personal answerWho can even know what's in it? Only portions of the draft have been leaked; it's impossible to read it currently, and I won't promise to support what I can't even read. The idea sounds fine...but don't all political promises sound great? |
经济 › 比特币
5>5 Personal answerOur government literally runs a counterfeiting ring, and has no legal or moral authority to say what we use in trade. It needs to instead restore its own constitutional monetary policy, and stop monetizing debt through the Federal Reserve System. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You are a centrist on right wing and left wing issues. 这一主题是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on politically correct and politically incorrect issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on security and privacy issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “isolationism”, meaning you more often believe we should focus attention on our most pressing issues at home instead of involving ourselves in non-threatening issues abroad. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on progressive and traditional issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “small government”, meaning you more often believe the government is overly bureaucratic, inefficient, and wasteful. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “laissez-faire”, meaning you more often believe government intervention in economic markets leads to long term negative results. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on deregulation and regulation issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “assimilation”, meaning you more often believe we should be a unified culture. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.