Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
外交政策 › 义务兵役
4>4 Personal answerPeople are turned down in the screening process for a reason. Do we really want every Tom, Dick and Harry to be granted the same status our soldiers work hard for? Not every one is cut out for that life. Most soldiers and their families do not want to or their loved one serving next to someone who doesn't want to be there, who could put their life at risk. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
4>4 Personal answerSeriously this is being discussed. How about we also stop all Christians in case they are affiliated with the KKK. Yes lets discriminate against Muslim immigrants because all terror plots in Aus haven't been from home grown terrorists. NO as Australians we cannot and should not discriminate, normal screening is ok. |
移民 › 船移民
4>4 Personal answerDepending on their reason. Fleeing because they are sort out by the Taliban and have no other option YES, After a better life because they don't like their country NO. |
经济 › 政府支出
4>4 Personal answerNo, cut back on over spending in unneeded areas (Bob the pollie didn't need the tax payers to cover his lunch cost, Jan the pollie doesn't need the tax payers to cover her clothing cost). Cap ex and currant polies wages to 200,000 if above, cut spending on business trips, no one needs first or business class, economy is just fine, Taxies are also cheaper then helicopters. Higher taxes to big businesses and less tax breaks to wealthy people. Make criminals in gaol turn the government a profit (use them for slave labour, if their in there because they are no good to the community put them to work and make the gaol turn a profit straight into the government kitty.) stop sending money to Indonesia, if they can invade West Papua New Guinea they should be able to look after their own. Bring in an Idiot Tax for all those people who do dumb stuff that cost the tax payer money, like hurt themselves in a public area and try to claim compensation, E.G. falling in a clear noticeable hole, or swimming on a when a beach is closed and needing public assistance when the whole situation could have been avoided. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You are a centrist on right wing and left wing issues. 这一主题是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on politically correct and politically incorrect issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on security and privacy issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “isolationism”, meaning you more often believe we should focus attention on our most pressing issues at home instead of involving ourselves in non-threatening issues abroad. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on progressive and traditional issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “small government”, meaning you more often believe the government is overly bureaucratic, inefficient, and wasteful. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “laissez-faire”, meaning you more often believe government intervention in economic markets leads to long term negative results. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on deregulation and regulation issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “assimilation”, meaning you more often believe we should be a unified culture. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.