Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
国内政策 › 原住民识别
4>4 Personal answerIt's important, but a referendum is incredibly expensive to hold. It would be more efficient to actually do something that would provide resources that would actually help someone, and serve more of a purpose than just sit there as a token gesture. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
4>4 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 对朝鲜的军事打击
4>4 Personal answer不,我不相信朝鲜拥有或有能力发展远程核导弹 |
社会 › 学校安全
4>4 Personal answerThe idea behind it is nice, but there are better ways of going about it than asking children those kinds of questions. I'd like to see this program scrapped, and replaced with a more tactful one. |
经济 › 国家宽带网络
4>4 Personal answer是的国家的高速光纤网络是经济的澳大利亚的未来的关键 |
国内政策 › 帝制
4>4 Personal answerSure, why not, but let's do this when we have a lot of spare funds sitting around. It's a pretty pointless venture. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You are a centrist on right wing and left wing issues. 这一主题是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on politically correct and politically incorrect issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on security and privacy issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “isolationism”, meaning you more often believe we should focus attention on our most pressing issues at home instead of involving ourselves in non-threatening issues abroad. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on progressive and traditional issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “small government”, meaning you more often believe the government is overly bureaucratic, inefficient, and wasteful. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “laissez-faire”, meaning you more often believe government intervention in economic markets leads to long term negative results. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on deregulation and regulation issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “assimilation”, meaning you more often believe we should be a unified culture. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.