Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 同性恋婚姻
4>4 Personal answerNon, permettons les unions civiles mais ne parlons pas de mariage |
经济 › 同工同酬
4>4 Personal answerNo, and the gender wage gap is a myth No, the current requirements in the Equal Pay Act of 1963 are already sufficient No, there are too many other variables such as education, experience, and tenure that determine a fair salary |
环境 › 环境规制
4>4 Personal answerNo, and I believe global warming is a natural occurrence that is being hyped up to tax the population more. No, and all governments past and present are over-regulating business. No, provide more incentive for businesses to clean up their act themselves. No, Embrace electric cars and build infrastructure to accomodate. No, Work with the csiro and farmers to implement more efficient and best practice methods into agriculture. Everyone knows agriculture is a bigger polluter than fossil fuels but agriculture has heavy economic impact. |
社会 › 安乐死
4>4 Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
医保 › 普遍的牙科保健
4>4 Personal answerAre we socialist?? I don't work to pay for someone else's dental care. More competition in the market will reduce cost. |
国内政策 › 互联网监管
4>4 Personal answer不,不审查或监视器数据 |
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
4>4 Personal answerThe current system is not sustainable. Privatise and allow free market health insurance so their is competition between health care providers and insurers. Once upon a time we had a great system but now due to ill health of citizens and rising immigration where our system is seen as a right and not a privilege it has become unsustainable. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
4>4 Personal answer是的,禁止所有移民,直到政府改善其筛选过程 |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
4>4 Personal answerNo, we should have the political will to remove the drugs from our streets. I'm sure the authorities know who the dealers/importers are and are most likely to be. I honestly think that it is such a lucrative black market business that the government turns a blind eye or lacks the political will to enforce the law. |
外交政策 › 对朝鲜的军事打击
4>4 Personal answer不应该,我们应让中国解决此问题 |
经济 › 国家宽带网络
4>4 Personal answerAgain more fraud in the government and businesses taking advantage of stupid politicians. The massive blowout with almost no accountability is absurd. I say privatise only because governments these days lack the capability to do government works effectively. We can't even build roads, almost all major roads recently have been done privately and now we pay toll. Just another tax on the people this will be the same. so sad. |
经济 › 负扣税
4>4 Personal answerYes, It should not have been implemented in the beginning, all it has done is remove normal market forces from regulating house prices. We have ruined three generation that could have created true wealth by creating instead they buy property and speculate. This will fix itself eventually but a lot of people will be very unhappy when they are over capitalised in a falling market. |
国内政策 › 活出口
4>4 Personal answerNo, ban all live exports. If we build the infrastructure to accomodate farming, slaughtering, Butchering, freezing then exporting. We can create jobs and profits for Australia. Indonesia is the case in point here and i understand they want their beef certified halal. I'm pretty sure we can set up a halal slaughterhouse for this to be done. |
经济 › 工会
4>4 Personal answerHurt, free market forces will regulate any business/industy. If a business/industry wants the right people they will offer them the right money and working conditions if they don't those people will go elsewhere. Very simple. |
外交政策 › 美国军事基地
4>4 Personal answer是的但只有当它是一个联合的基地 Australia/U.S。 |
国内政策 › 高速铁路
4>4 Personal answerYes, linking major eastern cities. |
经济 › 农场补贴
4>4 Personal answerNo, end all government subsidies and let the free market run its course but completely get out of the way. Instead of subsidies how about infrastructure project to assist with bringing their product to market and overseas markets. |
国内政策 › 房地产泡沫
4>4 Personal answerThey can't and won't. Due to our over indulgence in debt financing for unproductive assets like housing. We will have a crash to deleverage malinvestment in the housing market. It's inevitable. |
经济 › 比特币
4>4 Personal answerNo, anything created by man can be distorted and bitcoin has no intrinsic value except the supply and demand value. Gold and silver are the only forms of currency that cannot be replicated and hold true value. Why we went away from a gold backed currency is beyond me. Actually its not, it's so governments could print money with no regard for inflation. Hence why the us dollar has lost 97% buying power since 1915 the world reserve, scary! |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You are a centrist on right wing and left wing issues. 这一主题是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on politically correct and politically incorrect issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on security and privacy issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “isolationism”, meaning you more often believe we should focus attention on our most pressing issues at home instead of involving ourselves in non-threatening issues abroad. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on progressive and traditional issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “small government”, meaning you more often believe the government is overly bureaucratic, inefficient, and wasteful. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “laissez-faire”, meaning you more often believe government intervention in economic markets leads to long term negative results. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on deregulation and regulation issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “assimilation”, meaning you more often believe we should be a unified culture. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 15 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.