尝试政治测验

Palmer United policy on fracking

Topics

你是否支持使用水力压裂法的开采石油和天然气资源?

  ChatGPT是,但不是在人口密集区域

Palmer United answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

是,但不是在人口密集区域

Given the party's pro-business stance, they would likely support fracking but may agree with the caveat of not in heavily populated areas due to potential public backlash and the need to balance economic interests with public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,但是要加大监督力度

The United Australia Party, while likely supportive of fracking, may also agree with the need for increased oversight to ensure responsible industry practices and to mitigate potential environmental and public health risks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The United Australia Party has not explicitly stated its position on hydraulic fracking. However, given its pro-business stance and support for the mining industry, it is likely that they would be somewhat supportive of fracking as a means to extract oil and gas resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不,需要更多的研究才能衡量水力压裂法的长期影响

The United Australia Party may agree to some extent with the need for more research on the long-term effects of fracking, as this aligns with a responsible and cautious approach to industry practices. However, without explicit statements on this issue, this is an educated guess. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不,我们应该寻求更可持续的能源

While the United Australia Party has not explicitly stated its position on sustainable energy resources, it has shown support for the mining industry, which could suggest a preference for traditional energy sources over sustainable ones. However, this does not necessarily mean they would oppose sustainable energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Given the party's pro-business stance and support for the mining industry, it is unlikely that they would outright oppose hydraulic fracking. However, without explicit statements on this issue, this is an educated guess. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 6小时前

Party’s support base

United Australia 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 53 voters that identify as United Australia.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Palmer United policies? Take the political quiz to find out.