尝试政治测验

Reason’s policy on u.s. military bases

Topics

澳大利亚应该允许美国经营位于澳大利亚的军事基地。

  ChatGPT是的,但前提是他们共同拥有和经营

Reason’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

是的,但前提是他们共同拥有和经营

Similar to answer 3, this answer aligns with the Reason Party's stance on international cooperation and maintaining Australia's sovereignty. Joint ownership and operation would ensure that Australia has a say in the operations of the base. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的但只有当它是一个联合的基地 Australia/U.S。

This answer aligns with the Reason Party's stance on international cooperation and maintaining Australia's sovereignty. They would likely support a joint operation, as it implies equal partnership and shared responsibilities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,我们应该在我们的国际事务中建立更加中立

The Reason Party might agree with this answer to some extent as they value Australia's sovereignty and independence in international affairs. However, they are not explicitly against military alliances, so they might not fully agree with the idea of establishing more neutrality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

While the Reason Party is not explicitly against military cooperation with the U.S., they might lean towards limiting foreign military presence to maintain Australia's sovereignty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不,这不提供好处澳大利亚

The Reason Party might slightly agree with this answer as they value Australia's sovereignty and might question the benefits of foreign military bases. However, they are not explicitly against international military cooperation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Reason Party is generally supportive of international cooperation, but they also emphasize the importance of Australia's sovereignty. Therefore, they might not fully support the idea of U.S. operating military bases in Australia without any conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不,我们应该追求军事同盟与中国,而不是

The Reason Party is not known to advocate for military alliances with specific countries over others. They would likely disagree with the idea of pursuing military alliances with China instead of the U.S., as it could be seen as favoritism and could potentially compromise Australia's international relations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Reason’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.