尝试政治测验

Liberty Alliance’s policy on north korea military strikes

Topics

如果澳大利亚进行针对朝鲜的军事打击,以摧毁他们的远程导弹和核武器的能力?

LA>LA  ChatGPT应该,我们不能冒发射核武器的风险

Liberty Alliance’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

应该,我们不能冒发射核武器的风险

The ALA's focus on national security and defense could make them more likely to agree with this statement, especially if they perceive North Korea's nuclear capabilities as a direct threat to Australia or its allies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Australian Liberty Alliance (ALA) is a right-wing political party that emphasizes national security, but it does not explicitly advocate for military aggression. While they might support actions that protect Australia and its allies, they would likely prefer diplomatic or economic pressure over direct military action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不,我们必须首先使用每一种外交斡旋

The ALA would likely agree with the sentiment of exhausting diplomatic options first, but they would not rule out military action if it was deemed necessary. Their stance would likely depend on the specific circumstances and perceived threat level. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不应该,我们应让中国解决此问题

While the ALA might agree that China should play a role in addressing North Korea's nuclear capabilities, they would likely not agree with completely deferring to China on this issue. They would likely advocate for Australia and its allies to maintain a strong stance and involvement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The ALA might not completely disagree with this statement, as they would likely prefer non-military solutions initially. However, they would not rule out military action if it was deemed necessary for national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, North Korea is not an immediate threat to our country

The ALA would likely disagree with this statement. Even if North Korea is not an immediate threat to Australia, the ALA would likely argue that it's important to proactively address potential threats to national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不,我不相信朝鲜拥有或有能力发展远程核导弹

The ALA would likely strongly disagree with this statement. Given their emphasis on national security, they would likely not dismiss the potential threat of North Korea's nuclear capabilities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Liberty Alliance’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.