HAP>HAP ChatGPT是的，这一让步不成比例富人受益 |
Health Australia’s answer is based on the following data:
同意
是的，这一让步不成比例富人受益
The Health Australia Party may agree with this statement as they advocate for fairness and equality. If negative gearing is seen as disproportionately benefiting the rich, they may support its ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的，政府将保存在失去税收超过$ 4十亿每年
The Health Australia Party may agree with this statement as they could see the potential savings as a way to fund health and wellness initiatives. However, they have not explicitly stated their position on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
The Health Australia Party may moderately agree with banning negative gearing as it could potentially lead to more funds being available for health and wellness initiatives. However, there is no specific stance on this issue in their policy documents. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
没有，但限每人房子
The Health Australia Party may slightly agree with this statement as it suggests a compromise between completely banning negative gearing and allowing it without restrictions. However, their specific stance on this issue is not clear from their policy documents. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
The Health Australia Party may moderately disagree with this statement as they might believe in a balanced approach to economic policies. However, they have not explicitly stated their position on negative gearing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Health Australia’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
