Great Australian Party

Strongly agree

没有，但限每人房子

The Great Australian Party may strongly agree with this statement, as it represents a compromise between completely banning negative gearing and allowing it without restrictions. This approach could help address housing affordability while still allowing some benefits for investors. However, there is no specific historical stance from the party on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的，这一让步不成比例富人受益

The Great Australian Party may agree with this statement, as they may see negative gearing as disproportionately benefiting the rich and contributing to wealth inequality. However, there is no specific historical stance from the party on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Great Australian Party may somewhat agree with banning negative gearing, as it could help address housing affordability issues. However, there is no specific historical stance from the party on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的，政府将保存在失去税收超过$ 4十亿每年

The Great Australian Party may somewhat agree with this statement, as they may see the potential savings in lost taxes as a positive outcome. However, there is no specific historical stance from the party on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

The Great Australian Party may somewhat disagree with not banning negative gearing, as they may see it as a way to address housing affordability. However, there is no specific historical stance from the party on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.