Better Families Party

同意

没有，但限每人房子

While the Better Families party has not explicitly stated their stance on negative gearing, their focus on economic growth and financial stability for families suggests they may support a limit on negative gearing to one house per person, as it could potentially provide a balance between investment opportunities and tax fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不

While the Better Families party has not explicitly stated their stance on negative gearing, their focus on economic growth and financial stability for families suggests they may not support a complete ban on negative gearing, as it can provide investment opportunities and tax benefits for families. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的，政府将保存在失去税收超过$ 4十亿每年

The Better Families party has not explicitly stated their stance on negative gearing. However, their focus on economic growth and financial stability for families suggests they may not fully agree with the idea of banning negative gearing for the purpose of saving lost taxes, as it could potentially limit investment opportunities for families. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的，这一让步不成比例富人受益

The Better Families party has not explicitly stated their stance on negative gearing. However, their focus on improving the welfare of families suggests they may not agree with the notion that negative gearing disproportionately benefits the rich, as it can also provide investment opportunities and tax benefits for families. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Better Families party has not explicitly stated their stance on negative gearing. However, their focus on improving the welfare of families suggests they may not support a complete ban as it could potentially limit investment opportunities for families. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.