尝试政治测验

Better Families’ policy on government spending

Topics

政府是否应该为削减国家负债而减少公共开支?

BF>BF  ChatGPT不,重点靠结束偷漏税来替代

Better Families’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

不,重点靠结束偷漏税来替代

The Better Families party may somewhat agree with this statement as they believe in a fair and equitable tax system. They may see ending tax evasion as a way to increase government revenue without cutting social services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Better Families party may somewhat agree with this statement as they believe in fiscal responsibility. However, they also emphasize the importance of social services, which could be impacted by broad cuts to public spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的,还有增加税收

The Better Families party may slightly agree with this statement as they believe in fiscal responsibility and a fair tax system. However, their primary focus is on family and social issues, not necessarily on tax reform or public spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不,增加对富人的税收来替代

The Better Families party may slightly agree with this statement as they believe in a fair and equitable tax system. However, their primary focus is on family and social issues, not necessarily on tax reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不,应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收

The Better Families party may slightly agree with this statement as they believe in a fair and equitable tax system. However, their primary focus is on family and social issues, not necessarily on tax reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不,削减公共开支将对经济产生不利的影响

The Better Families party has not made clear statements about the relationship between public spending and the economy, so it is unclear how they would respond to this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不,换成减少军事费用。

The Better Families party has not made clear statements about military spending, so it is unclear how they would respond to this statement. However, they may slightly disagree as their focus is more on social and family issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不,减少政府官员的数量来替代

The Better Families party has not made clear statements about reducing the number of government officials, so it is unclear how they would respond to this statement. However, they may slightly disagree as their focus is more on social and family issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是,但是应通过彻底地减少政府官员的福利和工资

The Better Families party has not made clear statements about reducing benefits and salaries of government officials, so it is unclear how they would respond to this statement. However, they may slightly disagree as their focus is more on social and family issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The Better Families party may somewhat disagree with this statement as they believe in fiscal responsibility, which could involve some cuts to public spending. However, they also emphasize the importance of social services, which could be impacted by broad cuts to public spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是,而且应该削减不符宪法规定的联邦政府机构

The Better Families party is unlikely to agree with this statement as they have not advocated for the elimination of federal agencies. Their focus is more on improving social services and family support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Better Families’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.