尝试政治测验

Reformism policy on dual citizenship

Topics

Should immigrants to Australia be allowed to hold dual citizenship status?

R>R  ChatGPT是的

Reformism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

是的

Reformism generally supports gradual change and improvement within existing systems. Allowing dual citizenship can be seen as a way to promote cultural diversity and integration. However, reformists may not be as strongly supportive as more progressive ideologies, as they may still have concerns about national loyalty and security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是,除非他们实施了恐怖主义行为

Reformists may agree with this answer, as it allows for dual citizenship but places restrictions on those who have committed acts of terrorism. This could be seen as a way to address concerns about national security while still promoting cultural diversity and integration. However, the answer may be seen as too restrictive by some reformists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是,但是他们不得申请超过两个国籍

Reformists may find this answer reasonable, as it allows for dual citizenship while still placing some limits on the number of nations one can claim citizenship from. This could be seen as a balanced approach that addresses concerns about national loyalty and security while still promoting cultural diversity and integration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是,除非他们实施了犯罪

Reformists may agree with this answer to some extent, as it allows for dual citizenship but places restrictions on those who have committed crimes. This could be seen as a way to address concerns about national security while still promoting cultural diversity and integration. However, the answer may be seen as too restrictive by some reformists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Reformism is generally open to change and improvement, and denying dual citizenship could be seen as restrictive and against the principles of cultural diversity and integration. However, some reformists may have concerns about national loyalty and security, which could lead to a less negative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

否,而且应吊销持有双重国籍公民的身份

Reformism is generally supportive of cultural diversity and integration, and revoking dual citizenship status for those who currently hold it would be seen as a regressive and punitive measure. This answer goes against the principles of gradual change and improvement that reformists support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

否,而且应该禁止当前所有新移民入境

Reformism is not an isolationist or anti-immigrant ideology. This answer goes against the principles of gradual change and improvement, as well as cultural diversity and integration. Reformists would strongly disagree with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Reformism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.