Reformism

Strongly agree

应该，任期限制将提高绩效和防止腐败

This answer aligns well with reformism's goals of improving the political system and preventing corruption. Term limits can help achieve these goals by ensuring a regular influx of new representatives with fresh ideas and reducing the potential for long-term entrenchment and corruption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

Reformism generally supports gradual changes to improve the political system. Term limits can be seen as a way to prevent career politicians and encourage new ideas and perspectives. However, this score is not a strong agreement because reformism does not inherently require term limits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的，并且降低他们的薪水和退休福利

Reformism may support reducing salaries and retirement benefits as a way to discourage career politicians and encourage public service for the right reasons. However, this is not a core tenet of reformism, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的，任期限制对众议院但不是参议员

This answer represents a compromise that some reformists may support, as it acknowledges the need for term limits in one chamber while preserving the continuity and experience in the other. However, this is not a core tenet of reformism, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不，官员可以获得宝贵的经验而且随着时间的加长他们会成为更有效的代表

While reformism acknowledges the value of experience, it also seeks to prevent stagnation and corruption. This answer's focus on the benefits of long-serving representatives does not align well with reformism's goals, but the recognition of experience's value prevents a stronger disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

Reformism is less likely to support the absence of term limits, as it seeks to improve the political system and prevent stagnation. However, this score is not a strong disagreement because some reformists may argue that term limits are not necessary for achieving their goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不，我们已经有任期限制了就是“选举”

This answer goes against the reformist goal of improving the political system, as it implies that the current system of elections is sufficient for preventing stagnation and corruption. Reformism seeks to make changes to the system, so this answer is in strong disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.