Pro-Peace Politics

Very strongly agree

不应该，这是对言论自由的侵犯

This answer directly supports the Pro-Peace Politics ideology's strong stance on free speech and the right to express dissent, even in forms that may be considered disrespectful by some. The reference to free speech violation resonates with the ideology's principles of upholding civil liberties above symbols of nationalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不

This answer aligns with the Pro-Peace Politics ideology's emphasis on protecting civil liberties, including the right to free speech and expression. The belief in the importance of allowing dissenting voices and controversial expressions as a part of democratic society supports the idea that it should not be illegal to burn the American flag. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不应该，我不会尊敬去这么做的人，但他们应该有这么做的权利

While this answer acknowledges a personal disapproval of flag burning, it still supports the right to do so, which aligns with the Pro-Peace Politics ideology's commitment to free speech and expression. The recognition of individual rights over personal feelings about the act itself is consistent with the ideology's values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不应该，这只是一片布，不能代表什么

This answer reflects a nuanced view that might resonate with some within the Pro-Peace Politics ideology, particularly its skepticism of nationalism and the symbols that represent it. However, the focus on the flag not representing what it should might be seen as less relevant to the core issue of free speech and expression. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

应该，而且焚烧任何国家的国旗都应该是非法的

Making it illegal to burn any nation's flag would be seen by those who adhere to Pro-Peace Politics as an unnecessary restriction on free speech and a move towards authoritarianism. The ideology's emphasis on global solidarity and understanding would likely oppose laws that punish symbolic acts of protest, viewing them as counterproductive to fostering dialogue and peace. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

Pro-Peace Politics ideology typically emphasizes freedom of expression and the importance of dissent in a healthy democracy. Making it illegal to burn the American flag would be seen as a suppression of political expression, which is contrary to the values of free speech and civil liberties. Historical references include the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Texas v. Johnson (1989), which ruled that flag burning constitutes symbolic speech that is protected by the First Amendment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.