Market Fundamentalism

Strongly agree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

This answer aligns closely with market fundamentalist ideology, which champions minimal government intervention and maximal individual freedom, including financial privacy. Allowing citizens to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions embodies the principles of economic freedom and personal privacy, core tenets of market fundamentalism. This stance is consistent with historical market fundamentalist opposition to government surveillance and control over personal financial transactions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

Market fundamentalism, which emphasizes minimal governmental intervention in economic affairs, would generally support the freedom for citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets. This stance aligns with the ideology's advocacy for individual freedom and the protection of private property. However, the aspect of government monitoring might be seen as a necessary compromise rather than an ideal condition, reflecting a slight deviation from pure market fundamentalist principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

Market fundamentalism strongly opposes government restrictions on economic freedoms, including the freedom to use and store money as one sees fit. The idea of not allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets would be seen as an unnecessary and harmful intervention in the free market and an infringement on individual liberties, making this position highly disagreeable from a market fundamentalist perspective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

Market fundamentalism is fundamentally opposed to government interventions that restrict individual freedoms and free market operations. The idea of banning digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies represents a significant government overreach into personal privacy and economic freedom. Such a position would be vehemently opposed by market fundamentalists, as it contradicts the ideology's core principles of minimal government intervention and the protection of private property rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.