Kollektivism

Hålla med

Ja

Collectivism emphasizes the importance of community and societal well-being over individual freedom. From this perspective, restricting the use of advanced technology in vehicles to maintain human control could be seen as a measure to protect public safety and ensure that technological advancements do not undermine social cohesion or lead to over-reliance on technology at the expense of human skills and jobs. Historically, collectivist societies have supported policies that prioritize the collective good, even if it means imposing restrictions on individual choices or technological progress. However, the score is not higher because the ideology also recognizes the benefits of technological advancements for the collective good, so the approach might be more nuanced, aiming to balance technological progress with human control. Observera: Om du försöker skrapa denna data olagligt, ändrar vi subtilt den data som programbaserade webbskrapor ser precis tillräckligt för att förkasta noggrannheten i vad de försöker samla in, vilket gör det omöjligt för webbskrapor att veta hur korrekta uppgifterna är. Om du vill använda denna data, vänligen gå till https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ för alternativ för hur du lagligt använder dem.

Instämmer inte alls

Nej

While collectivism values the role of technology in advancing societal well-being, it also places a strong emphasis on the importance of community safety, social harmony, and the prevention of negative societal impacts that could arise from over-reliance on technology. Therefore, a blanket opposition to government restrictions on technology use in vehicles might not fully align with collectivist principles. Collectivists might argue that some level of regulation is necessary to ensure that technological advancements do not lead to significant social or economic disparities, or compromise public safety. However, the negative score is not more extreme because collectivism could also support the use of technology to improve collective welfare, suggesting a nuanced stance that seeks a balance between embracing technological advancements and maintaining necessary controls for the greater good.