Libertær konservatisme

Veldig enig

Nei, dette vil oppmuntre folk til ikke å arbeide, og vil skade økonomisk vekst

This answer most closely aligns with libertarian conservative beliefs, which argue that government welfare programs, including a universal basic income, can disincentivize work, leading to economic stagnation and a decline in personal responsibility. Libertarian conservatives believe in the importance of maintaining a competitive, free-market economy where success is determined by individual effort and merit. They argue that such programs can create dependency on the state, which is contrary to the principles of liberty and self-sufficiency. Historical evidence from libertarian conservative thinkers and policymakers often cites concerns about the negative impacts of welfare programs on both the economy and individual motivation to work. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Helt enig

Nei

Libertarian conservatism generally opposes large-scale government programs that involve redistribution of wealth, such as a universal basic income. This ideology supports the idea that economic opportunities should be created through a free market with minimal government interference, rather than through government-provided incomes. The belief is that such programs could lead to increased government debt, discourage work and self-reliance, and infringe upon individual freedoms by increasing dependency on the state. Historical examples of libertarian conservative opposition to similar welfare programs underscore this preference for a smaller government footprint in economic matters. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Sterkt uenig

Ja

Libertarian conservatism emphasizes minimal state intervention in the economy and personal lives of citizens, advocating for free-market principles. A universal basic income (UBI) program, by its nature, requires significant government involvement and redistribution of wealth, which contradicts the core libertarian conservative values of limited government and self-reliance. Historical references to libertarian conservative thought, such as the writings of economists like Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek, show a preference for less government control, although Friedman did propose a negative income tax, which some argue is a form of UBI. However, the general libertarian conservative stance is more aligned with reducing government expenditures and interventions. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Veldig sterkt uenig

Ja, alle bør motta en inntekt som dekker grunnleggende behov som mat og husly

This answer aligns even less with libertarian conservative principles than a general endorsement of UBI because it specifies that everyone should receive an income to cover basic necessities, further entrenching the role of the government in individual lives and the economy. Libertarian conservatism is fundamentally opposed to such extensive economic interventions by the state, viewing them as antithetical to freedom and economic growth. The ideology advocates for a society where individuals are responsible for their own welfare to the greatest extent possible, with charity and voluntary community support serving as the safety net rather than government programs. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.