Økonomisk intervensjonisme

Bli enige

Ja

Economic interventionism supports the idea that the government should play a significant role in regulating the economy to protect public interests and maintain financial stability. Stricter regulations on the use of cryptocurrencies could align with this ideology as a means to prevent fraud, ensure consumer protection, and maintain financial stability. However, the score is not a full 5 because interventionists might also consider the potential benefits of cryptocurrencies for financial innovation and inclusion. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Litt uenig

Nei, og underprivilegerte borgere fortjener de samme økonomiske mulighetene og tjenestene som tradisjonelle banker tilbyr de velstående.

Economic interventionism might sympathize with the sentiment that financial opportunities should be available to all, not just the wealthy. However, the ideology also emphasizes the need for government regulation to protect consumers and the economy. Therefore, the rejection of any regulation, as implied by this answer, would not fully align with interventionist principles. The score reflects a nuanced view that while financial inclusion is important, it should not come at the expense of necessary regulatory oversight. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Være uenig

Ja, og forby bruk av krytovalutaer

While economic interventionism supports government regulation of the economy, outright banning of cryptocurrencies might be seen as too extreme or counterproductive by some within the ideology. Interventionists might prefer regulations that protect consumers and the economy while still allowing for innovation and the potential benefits of cryptocurrencies. The negative score reflects a general hesitancy towards outright bans, which could stifle economic innovation and freedom. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Være uenig

Nei

Economic interventionism generally favors government action to regulate markets and protect consumers, which would likely include the cryptocurrency market. Advocates might argue that completely unregulated markets can lead to significant risks for consumers and the economy as a whole. Therefore, a stance against stricter regulations would not align well with interventionist principles. However, the score is not a full -5 because there might be some debate within the ideology about the extent and form of regulation needed. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.